The investigation into Armstrong's use of effectiveness-boosting substances was intensive. USADA compiled testimony from previous teammates and collected Organic evidence that painted a damning photograph of Armstrong's doping tactics.

It contended that the traditional 8-12 months statute of restrictions for doping offenses did not apply due to Armstrong's "fraudulent concealment" of his doping. Armstrong, USADA mentioned, could not be allowed to get pleasure from the statute when he lied beneath oath in each the SCA situation and also the French investigation, intimidated witnesses and submitted affidavits that he knew ended up false. Longstanding precedent in U.S. courts retains that the statute of constraints isn't going to apply any time a defendant engages in fraudulent acts.[26][27][28]

In spite of his Preliminary denials, Armstrong in the end chose never to contest the charges against him in arbitration.

Hamman's hunch proved ideal; before the Times ran its story on the situation, USADA basic counsel Travis Tygart contacted Hamman and asked to see the evidence he'd gleaned.[24]

Community accusations of doping against Armstrong ended up produced as early as being the 1999 Tour de France. Especially, lots of European papers contended his victory in Stage 9, wherever he seemingly ascended the Alps with Nearly no issues, couldn't have already been doable via normal usually means.

The lack of endorsements highlighted the commercial repercussions of the USADA ruling. It demonstrated how rapidly a tarnished standing can effect an athlete's marketability.

Allegations within the ebook were being reprinted within the Sunday Instances in a very Tale by deputy sports editor Alan English in June 2004. Armstrong sued for libel, as well as the paper settled away from courtroom following a Significant Court docket choose inside of a pre-demo ruling mentioned which the article "intended accusation of guilt and not merely sensible grounds to suspect."[31] The newspaper's attorneys stated, "The Sunday Instances has confirmed to Mr.

, handles the allegations and eventual investigation into doping, together with other areas of Armstrong's everyday living which have here triggered him denouncing the accuracy in the movie in advance of its release (In spite of his own participation in interviews).

'Other folks termed it quits, I carried on' – Paul Double on the resilient highway from 'getting head kicked in' as being a U23 to the Giro d'Italia debut at 28

Allegations of doping hounded Lance Armstrong from the start of his comeback from most cancers to win the Tour de France in 1999 via to his retirement and past. 

As mentioned earlier mentioned, Mr. Armstrong challenged the arbitration process in federal courtroom. In response, the courtroom uncovered that “the USADA arbitration rules, which largely comply with Those people of the American Arbitration Association (AAA) are sufficiently robust to satisfy the requirements of thanks process.” USADA’s principles give that where by an athlete or other person is sanctioned simply because they fall short to contest USADA’s charges in arbitration, the sanction shall not be reopened or topic to attraction Unless of course the athlete or other particular person can exhibit that he did not receive genuine or constructive recognize of the opportunity to contest the sanction.

Armstrong banned for all times because of the UCI; stripped of all his success and prizes from August one, 1998 onwards (which include seven Tour de France titles and a single Olympic medal)

Armstrong's fall from grace dealt a serious blow to biking's believability. Sponsors withdrew support, and general public belief during the Activity plummeted. Quite a few questioned whether major performances can be realized devoid of functionality-improving medicines.

with a film that centers on An additional American athlete who may very well be equally properly-regarded, and far more divisive: bicycle owner Lance Armstrong.